ARCHIVE        BIOS/PHOTOS        CARTOONS        PARTNERS        CONTACT US        SUBSCRIBE 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WORD COUNT 680                                                                                                                  DECEMBER 29, 2004

KID’S BRAINS STILL GETTING POISONED – by Joyce Braithwaite-Brickley 

A decision made 75 years ago by the so-called best minds in U.S. commerce and government poisoned generations of American children, reducing I.Q. and school performance, and causing lifelong behavioral problems for tens of thousands. Despite grave public health concerns, auto and chemical companies in the mid-1920s won permission to introduce lead to gasoline, reducing engine knock and supporting the development of larger, more powerful cars. 

Today we are still cleaning up the mess. In Michigan alone, largely because of lead paint in older housing, more than 20,000 kids have levels of lead in their blood that are associated with neurological problems. The question for 2005 is: are we doing it again? 

No, not with lead. To her credit, Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm in November embraced a plan to eliminate childhood lead poisoning in Michigan by 2010. Granholm has put new leadership behind lead poisoning prevention and signed new laws to accelerate the day when no Michigan child's brain is impaired by toxic lead. 

Thanks to that initiative -- and the national phase-out of lead in gasoline that began in the 1970s -- the average level in the blood of U.S. children plummeted more than sevenfold between 1978 and 1999. It's a huge victory for public health. 

Unfortunately, what one hand of government giveth, the other may taketh away. As evidence grows that an assortment of chemicals in pesticides, consumer products, and manufacturing may be interfering with the development of children's brains, state and federal agencies are doing little to control these toxins. 

Consider that an estimated 70,000 chemicals are now permitted for use in the U. S., but that toxicity to the developing brain and nervous system of children has been determined for relatively few of them. Consider that Michigan and surrounding states and Ontario are among the biggest users of chemicals and generators of chemical wastes. Consider, too, that in the Great Lakes region, water circulates slowly, allowing chemicals and metals like mercury to build up in fish and wildlife. Further many low-income families, people of color and sport anglers consume lots of fish. Consider, finally, that in the early stages of life, a child's brain and central nervous system are undergoing remarkable development. The director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences has stated, "A little kid goes from a single cell to a laughing, sociable, intelligent, friendly human being over a course of two years -- that's dramatic growth and development." In this exquisitely sensitive time, exposure to the wrong chemical at the wrong time -- in doses that wouldn't faze an adult -- can have lifelong effects. Studies of children born to heavy consumers of fish contaminated with PCBs or mercury suggest that their brains are noticeably impaired. 

It's not just Great Lakes fish that cause the problem. Dr. William Weil, a pediatrician and professor emeritus at Michigan State, advises women to also limit servings of tuna to one per week and to avoid serving it to their young children. "The first trimester is crucial for brain development," Weil said. "If you're going to get pregnant, don't eat these fish for (the first) 120 days." 

Although there is no reason for panic, there is plenty of reason for action. When it comes to the health of children's brains, there is no cost-benefit equation that can properly render the chemical damage done by reduced intelligence, behavioral problems, and the resulting emotional price that families pay. As a society, we're smarter than we were in the 1920s -- so do we really want to make our children dumber so we adults can enjoy "the good life" allegedly made possible by chemicals? 

The answer should be no. And we can have most of that good life without hurting our children. If we require testing to assure the safety of chemicals to children's brains before they can be used, if we ban the chemicals that are suspected today of harming children, and if we help parents protect their children from toxins in every day life, we can avoid another lead-like catastrophe. 

-- 

Joyce Braithwaite-Brickley was assistant to the Michigan Republican Party chairman and political advisor and campaign manager for former Gov. William G. Milliken. Her essays have appeared widely in the state. priorities@charter.net --  A photo of Joyce Braithwaite-Brickley is available CLICK HERE

# # # # # #

 

EDITORS NOTE: MinutemanMedia.org is seeking, after all these years, to become a bit higher profile. For this reason we would be grateful if you would credit us with any piece you may use: "Distributed by MinutemanMedia.org." (or similar).